0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°£È£ÇмúÁö Âü°í¹®Çå ÀοëÀÇ Á¤È®¼º

Accuracy of References in Eight Nursing Journals in Korea

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2008³â 38±Ç 1È£ p.180 ~ 185
KMID : 0806120080380010180
¼®¹ÎÇö ( Suk Min-Hyun ) - Æ÷õÁß¹®ÀÇ°ú´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ

ÀåÈñÁ¤ ( Jang Hee-Jung ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
¹ÚÁ¤¼÷ ( Park Jeong-Sook ) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èÇý¿ø ( Kim Hae-Won ) - °üµ¿´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¼­¿¬¿Á ( Suh Yeon-Ok ) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
½ÅÇö¼÷ ( Shin Hyun-Sook ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ
¾çÁøÇâ ( Yang Jin-Hyang ) - ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
Á¤¸é¼÷ ( Jung Myun-Sook ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
Á¤¸í½Ç ( Chung Myung-Sill ) - ¼º½Å¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to investigate the reference accuracy in major nursing journals in Korea.

Methods: The references in articles from eight nursing journals from 2006 were compared with PubMed for authors, year, title, journal, volume, and page accuracy. Four hundred sixty-six references were reviewed. Errors were classified as major or minor and categorized by bibliographic headings (author, title, journal, year, volume and page).

Results: Of the 466 references, 223 (47.9%) had citation errors. The reference error rates ranged from 28.6% to 58.7%. Most errors occurred in the author element (37.9%), followed by title (20.9%), journal (19.0%), page (13.9%), volume (5.9%), and year (2.4%).

Conclusion: This study identified a considerable error rate in the references of nursing journals. Inaccuracy of references is a reflection on scholarly work of authors and journals. Authors and Editorial committees are responsible for the accuracy of references.
KeyWords
Âü°í¹®Çå, Á¤È®¼º
Reference, Accuracy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed